So I asked Chat GPT if this statement was problematic. Here's what it said:

The statement can be seen as problematic for several reasons:

Generalization: It implies that all men are potential aggressors, which is a sweeping generalization. While it's true that many women have experienced aggression or abuse, it is not accurate or fair to label all men as potential threats. This can perpetuate negative stereotypes and contribute to an adversarial view of gender relations.

Stereotyping: Even though the statement tries to argue against stereotyping by appealing to statistics and personal experiences, it still reinforces a stereotype that men are inherently aggressive. This can be harmful and contribute to a biased perception of men as a group.

Potential to Foster Fear and Distrust: Such statements can contribute to an environment of fear and distrust between genders. While it is important to acknowledge and address the prevalence of male aggression, it's also crucial to avoid language that paints all men with the same brush.

Overemphasis on Personal Anecdotes: While personal experiences are valid and important, using them as a basis for broad claims about an entire gender can be misleading. Statistics and studies can provide a more balanced view, but they should be contextualized and interpreted carefully to avoid reinforcing biases.

Lack of Nuance: The statement does not acknowledge the complexity of the issue. It overlooks the efforts and existence of many men who actively work against gender violence and support gender equality.

A more balanced approach would involve recognizing the prevalence of male aggression and abuse, supporting survivors, and working to change societal norms, while also avoiding sweeping generalizations about any gender.