Hi Sarah,

Thanks for writing this. So when the protesters burned the police precinct, it was similar to the property destruction of the Boston Tea Party. The destruction was target directly at the oppressor.

So, if the protester were burning and looting businesses owned by innocent bystanders (I'm business owners are all innocent or that the burning or looting was done by the protesters...please treat this as a strictly hypothetical), do you consider that justified? Or should it be condemned? Or is it just an unfortunate side-effect of civil unrest?